Posts Tagged ‘Strategy’

divider

Sterling Buzz…

Tuesday, November 15th, 2011

Debbie talks with ADWEEK about The Blanding of America: Why Is Presidential Candidates’ Branding So Dull?

blanding-america-2011

divider

Mitsubishi: Nice Move, but not a Game Changer

Wednesday, October 12th, 2011

If successful brands and their leadership have taught us anything, it’s that being the first to do something (and do it well) can catapult a brand ahead of the competition. Perhaps more than in any other industry, we need a giant leap forward in the realm of transportation, in terms of affordability and accessibility- but are the breakout ideas on alternative fuel really breakout anymore? What can make alternative transportation ‘Go’ already? (more…)

divider

Crowdsourcing Innovation

Tuesday, September 27th, 2011

For most brands, staying relevant means constantly pushing to evolve. Innovation plays a role in almost every modern brand, from paper towels to vacuum cleaners to mobile phones. And while most companies agree that innovation is vital to modern relevance, unique formulas for innovation differ widely. (more…)

divider

When Green Goes Awash

Friday, September 2nd, 2011

greens-awash

In the age where the word ‘green’ has become less of an adjective for a sustainable movement, and more of a corporate marketing attempt – it seems far too apparent that the cover has been blown as consumers wise up to the realities of green marketing and green branding initiatives.

With the present day economic realities partially to blame, we cannot ignore the fact that we are still faced with a recession. Unfortunately this leaves green branded products taking a heavy hit – as environmentally friendly products are viewed as an unnecessary luxury.

Sales down across the board and it’s hard to believe that it was only a mere 3 years ago, in 2008, when ‘green’ cleaning products like Green Works grossed $100 million in sales for Clorox. Fast forward three years later, sales are topping in at $60 million for Green Works today.

It would be easy to blame this digression solely on the economic downturn, however, most of the negative perceptions of green marketing and branding today are related to greenwashing.

Greenwashing, coined in 1986 by environmentalist Jay Westerveld, is used to describe the act of misleading consumers regarding environmental benefits of a product or service. With claims like ‘all natural’ branded on virtually anything today from cookies to cotton and diapers to detergent – consumers are now asking questions.

And rightfully so. Past offenders, including one of the nation’s largest and most recognizable cereal companies, were communicating that their cereal’s had ‘natural ingredients’  — when in reality, the corn used had been genetically modified and engineered.

A recent study, done by TerraChoice Environmental – claims that 99% of all products labeled as “green” do not live up to their claims. With green branded products sitting at a higher price point than most consumer products today – consumer’s simply refuse to spend extra money on products that fail to deliver on a viable point of difference.

For CPG companies, consumers (and the planet) to see any future benefit from the sustainable branded business – products claiming to be better for the environment need to do more than sit on the laurels of the branded ‘green’ name.

Putting the resources, energy and focus into changing the process rather than the perception of ‘green’ will be the only way to effectively change consumers spending habits.

Take Tyson Chicken for example. When they were caught labeling their chicken “all natural” (when in fact their chicken were being held in factory farms and being fed genetically modified corn) they responded by changing the way they raise their chickens. Today, all fresh branded Tyson Chicken is raised without any antibiotics.

At the end of the day, if you are going to attempt to brand a product as better for the environment, you better make sure the benefits outweigh more than just your company’s bottom line.  Green branded products as a marketing ploy are no longer profitable (nor consumer appreciated) options.

Samantha Schroeder, Design Management

divider

Call It a Comeback: Retail’s Back to Its Fighting Weight — Retail Brand Strategy

Friday, June 24th, 2011

Screen shot 2011-06-20 at 3.10.36 PM

It’s 2011 and the Great Recession has been declared: over. After poking out their heads, sniffing the air, and taking stock of their equity, a few Retail brands are equipped with a new strategic plan and poised to re-jigger the marketplace. From CPGs to the way we buy, read about a few brands that are fighting to win consumers hearts and changing the way we will look at Retail going forward– at Popsop.com

divider

Brand Positioning- Time to Turn Up the Volume

Friday, February 11th, 2011

11

Almost all agencies worth their salt include it as one of their core competencies. Almost every client of any sophistication acknowledges its importance. And yet, it seems to me, as an avid brand follower, that the topic of brand positioning and the accompanying benefit to the end user of meaningful difference, is totally absent from the everyday debate and chatter about brands.

Big question:  If brand positioning is that important and if it is so widely practiced, why the silence?

In my view, there are a number of reasons:

1.    The business of positioning is a fundamentally strategic exercise and over the past 10 years at least, the marketing community has become more and more interested and focused on the executional aspects of branding. Strategy, while appreciated, just doesn’t have the same sex appeal.

2. This point has been further exacerbated by what I call the “manliness factor” that still pervades many agencies today. A typical response would be along the following lines– “of course we can do positioning…I mean it’s strategic. That’s what we are, that’s what we do, isn’t it?”

3. More recently, we’ve all become (understandably) obsessed by digital and social media and these two together have turned up the volume so loud that almost every other topic in the marketing arena has suffered.

4. The topic of positioning has been further diluted by the absence of a champion. Many of us still remember the Ries & Trout book on positioning that was published in 1981, yes 1981. That’s 30 years ago. And the book is still in print and still being read. For a few years in the ‘90’s, Tom Peters took up the cause but since then, nobody has become famous talking about positioning.

What makes this situation even stranger is that consumers really value the importance of difference in a brand and in a 2010 research study that we undertook at Sterling Brands among 4000 US consumers, many were able to articulate the nuances between brands. They saw Pixar, Wii, Apple, Lego and Google as being very different. At the other extreme, they saw Citi, Bank of America, Capitol One and Chase as being almost totally interchangeable. The point here is that difference (aka positioning) continues to be important to every audience, whether it be agency, brand owner or end-user.

With no common standards and no agreed definition of what it means, everyone has set up their own version of positioning. And the result is exactly what one would expect…chaos! It is common in our work with clients to be handed historical or current positioning documents and this is where the problem can be seen more clearly. For example:

- on many occasions, positioning work authored by advertising agencies is not so much brand positioning but more communications positioning and yet it is referred to as ‘brand’ positioning

- when we see the work of digital agencies, positioning is often focused on just the digital opportunity, not the broader brand opportunity

- when we see the work from some other agencies, we sometimes see tag lines presented as positioning

- and sometimes clients conduct their own positioning and guess what, it’s often done by committee and the 300 words that go to make up the final prose often end up in inactionable jargon

Now please do not take this ranting as criticism of any of our competitors or any of our clients. That’s not the point. The real issue here is that positioning is a critical step in building successful brands and yet there is no single agreed approach that is contemporary and relevant to the times in which we live. With so much lack of consistency, we feel it’s time to bring some rigor and some discipline and some innovative thinking to positioning development. This would be good for everyone involved because it would level the playing field and the real leaders in positioning would emerge naturally from the marketplace and the faux ‘positioners’ would also naturally disappear.

It will take some sort of revolution to make this happen and it may not happen anytime soon but we’re ready, willing and able to be at the forefront of this positioning revolution. Anybody else like to join us?

Simon Williams

divider

Sterling’s New –Interactive- Cultural Pulse

Tuesday, January 25th, 2011

Now you can easily traverse the most important trends in brand design that continue to impact our strategies right now:

Cultural_Pulse_Interactive

divider

Emotions on the Rise

Friday, November 12th, 2010

This week I was one of nearly 1000 attendees at the Annual Market Research Event that took place in San Diego, California. There are all sorts of reasons why people attend this conference – for me, it was the opportunity to hear the chatter from within the research business and to get a sense of what’s important to this tribe of bright people and specifically what they are thinking and feeling about the future.

So let me start with a few personal observations: (more…)

divider

Our Strategy Just Got a Little Smarter

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

Sterling is pleased to announce that we’ve added two more brilliant minds to our Strategy Group!

AlisonM

Alison Munsell, SVP- Strategy SF

Alison is a committed brand-geek with a passion for disciplined problem solving of really meaty brand issues (more…)