Posts Tagged ‘positioning’

divider

CHOBANI – A Superb Example of Branding at Its Best

Tuesday, September 6th, 2011

chobani

For those of us close to the food and grocery business, there was little evidence in 2006 in the yogurt category of the massive disruption that was about to take place:

-the sector was growing consistently in line with other mature food categories

-the big players such as General Mills and Dannon were busy innovating at the edges, especially around healthier options and products targeted to kids

-store brands were still a distant threat in the category

Meanwhile, in New York and a few other urban areas, the Greek yogurt phenomenon was being trail-blazed by Fage (pronounced ā€œfah-yehā€) but apart from a small fanatical fanbase, very few people took any notice. It just didn’t seem that important.

Fast forward to 2011 where the greek yogurt sector now represents about 25%…yes 25% of total yogurt sales in a category valued at $6.8 billion annually.

So what happened?

Well the Fage brand continues to be a major player in the category and sales continue to expand rapidly. And while all the big players were definitely caught off guard, they are now all busy launching and enjoying the rewards of new Greek-style products. But the real news surrounds the game-changing brand called Chobani which has built a $250 million business annually in less than four years and which now dominates the Greek yogurt sector.

So how did a brand that didn’t even exist 5 years ago leave both the authentic Greek innovator (Fage) and the mainstream American brands (Yoplait and Dannon) in the dust? The answer makes for interesting reading and is a wonderful example of brand-building at its best.

Like many innovations, Chobani’s success stems from a confluence of events:

-it took an entrepreneur (Hamdi Ulukaya, a descendant of a long line of dairy farmers in Turkey,), with no knowledge of the yogurt business to see the marketplace opportunity

-this coincided with a noticeable change in consumer behavior at breakfast with more and more yogurt being eaten at the expense of cereal

-in turn, this was further fueled by the need for a healthier breakfast option– And Greek yogurt with its winning combination of simple, pure flavors with high protein together with low fat easily won this battle against the incumbent brands with their sweetener, coloring and preservative-filled traditional yogurts

-Chobani’s product is high quality and provides real evidence that good-for-you products do not need to taste disgusting- in fact it tastes superb

-add to the brand a wide range of flavors, simple and optimistic packaging and some new kids products and you begin to understand why the brand has such extraordinary momentum

-from a communications point of view, word of mouth- not just digital but also family-to-family helped spread the word as the Chobani distribution in turn moved from regional to national.

A few further thoughts about this remarkable brand story. From my perspective, what Chobani managed to achieve was to simultaneously ā€œAmerican-izeā€ and ā€œmainstreamā€ the Greek yogurt category – in the process it left behind both the major established yogurt brands as well as the original authentic Greek brand. In itself, this is an unbelievable feat. Furthermore, it achieved this with consumer prices significantly higher than historical norms and all this was done in less than four years while we were all struggling with the toughest recession in living memory.

To me, Chobani is a wonderful example of where the combination of catalytic product and clear positioning in the marketplace is the killer app for brand success. Congratulations to all those Chobani-ans who have made this possible and for giving millions of us a daily yogurt moment to savor.

Simon Williams

divider

When Green Goes Awash

Friday, September 2nd, 2011

greens-awash

In the age where the word ā€˜green’ has become less of an adjective for a sustainable movement, and more of a corporate marketing attempt – it seems far too apparent that the cover has been blown as consumers wise up to the realities of green marketing and green branding initiatives.

With the present day economic realities partially to blame, we cannot ignore the fact that we are still faced with a recession. Unfortunately this leaves green branded products taking a heavy hit – as environmentally friendly products are viewed as an unnecessary luxury.

Sales down across the board and it’s hard to believe that it was only a mere 3 years ago, in 2008, when ā€˜green’ cleaning products like Green Works grossed $100 million in sales for Clorox. Fast forward three years later, sales are topping in at $60 million for Green Works today.

It would be easy to blame this digression solely on the economic downturn, however, most of the negative perceptions of green marketing and branding today are related to greenwashing.

Greenwashing, coined in 1986 by environmentalist Jay Westerveld, is used to describe the act of misleading consumers regarding environmental benefits of a product or service. With claims like ā€˜all natural’ branded on virtually anything today from cookies to cotton and diapers to detergent – consumers are now asking questions.

And rightfully so. Past offenders, including one of the nation’s largest and most recognizable cereal companies, were communicating that their cereal’s had ā€˜natural ingredients’  — when in reality, the corn used had been genetically modified and engineered.

A recent study, done by TerraChoice Environmental – claims that 99% of all products labeled as ā€œgreenā€ do not live up to their claims. With green branded products sitting at a higher price point than most consumer products today – consumer’s simply refuse to spend extra money on products that fail to deliver on a viable point of difference.

For CPG companies, consumers (and the planet) to see any future benefit from the sustainable branded business – products claiming to be better for the environment need to do more than sit on the laurels of the branded ā€˜green’ name.

Putting the resources, energy and focus into changing the process rather than the perception of ā€˜green’ will be the only way to effectively change consumers spending habits.

Take Tyson Chicken for example. When they were caught labeling their chicken ā€œall naturalā€ (when in fact their chicken were being held in factory farms and being fed genetically modified corn) they responded by changing the way they raise their chickens. Today, all fresh branded Tyson Chicken is raised without any antibiotics.

At the end of the day, if you are going to attempt to brand a product as better for the environment, you better make sure the benefits outweigh more than just your company’s bottom line.Ā  Green branded products as a marketing ploy are no longer profitable (nor consumer appreciated) options.

Samantha Schroeder, Design Management

divider

The Wii Gambles on Gaming… Again

Thursday, July 21st, 2011

wii-u

I’m pretty disappointed by the debut of the Wii-U, Nintendo’s next iteration of the wildly successful Wii console.

I’m not disappointed by Nintendo – who I think continues to honor its adventurous DNA and will deliver a revolutionary product.Ā  I’m not disappointed by the Wii-U, at least not yet, because my impression will ultimately depend on the quality of the software.

I’m disappointed by the myopia of the journalist and investment communities.Ā  It’s been 6 weeks, and press coverage has dwindled to halfhearted blather about tech specs.Ā  Wall Street certainly made their opinion heard, dinging Nintendo stock by 5% after the announcement.

These so-called experts have missed the point: the Wii-U represents a bold wager on the future of the living room.Ā  Nintendo envisions a world where family members seamlessly share content and gaming experiences over multiple screens.Ā  Sitting in the hub of it all is the Wii-U. (more…)

divider

Brand Positioning- Time to Turn Up the Volume

Friday, February 11th, 2011

11

Almost all agencies worth their salt include it as one of their core competencies. Almost every client of any sophistication acknowledges its importance. And yet, it seems to me, as an avid brand follower, that the topic of brand positioning and the accompanying benefit to the end user of meaningful difference, is totally absent from the everyday debate and chatter about brands.

Big question:Ā  If brand positioning is that important and if it is so widely practiced, why the silence?

In my view, there are a number of reasons:

1.Ā Ā Ā  The business of positioning is a fundamentally strategic exercise and over the past 10 years at least, the marketing community has become more and more interested and focused on the executional aspects of branding. Strategy, while appreciated, just doesn’t have the same sex appeal.

2. This point has been further exacerbated by what I call the ā€œmanliness factorā€ that still pervades many agencies today. A typical response would be along the following lines– “of course we can do positioning…I mean it’s strategic. That’s what we are, that’s what we do, isn’t it?ā€

3. More recently, we’ve all become (understandably) obsessed by digital and social media and these two together have turned up the volume so loud that almost every other topic in the marketing arena has suffered.

4. The topic of positioning has been further diluted by the absence of a champion. Many of us still remember the Ries & Trout book on positioning that was published in 1981, yes 1981. That’s 30 years ago. And the book is still in print and still being read. For a few years in the ā€˜90’s, Tom Peters took up the cause but since then, nobody has become famous talking about positioning.

What makes this situation even stranger is that consumers really value the importance of difference in a brand and in a 2010 research study that we undertook at Sterling Brands among 4000 US consumers, many were able to articulate the nuances between brands. They saw Pixar, Wii, Apple, Lego and Google as being very different. At the other extreme, they saw Citi, Bank of America, Capitol One and Chase as being almost totally interchangeable. The point here is that difference (aka positioning) continues to be important to every audience, whether it be agency, brand owner or end-user.

With no common standards and no agreed definition of what it means, everyone has set up their own version of positioning. And the result is exactly what one would expect…chaos! It is common in our work with clients to be handed historical or current positioning documents and this is where the problem can be seen more clearly. For example:

- on many occasions, positioning work authored by advertising agencies is not so much brand positioning but more communications positioning and yet it is referred to as ā€˜brand’ positioning

- when we see the work of digital agencies, positioning is often focused on just the digital opportunity, not the broader brand opportunity

- when we see the work from some other agencies, we sometimes see tag lines presented as positioning

- and sometimes clients conduct their own positioning and guess what, it’s often done by committee and the 300 words that go to make up the final prose often end up in inactionable jargon

Now please do not take this ranting as criticism of any of our competitors or any of our clients. That’s not the point. The real issue here is that positioning is a critical step in building successful brands and yet there is no single agreed approach that is contemporary and relevant to the times in which we live. With so much lack of consistency, we feel it’s time to bring some rigor and some discipline and some innovative thinking to positioning development. This would be good for everyone involved because it would level the playing field and the real leaders in positioning would emerge naturally from the marketplace and the faux ā€˜positioners’ would also naturally disappear.

It will take some sort of revolution to make this happen and it may not happen anytime soon but we’re ready, willing and able to be at the forefront of this positioning revolution. Anybody else like to join us?

Simon Williams

divider

Emotions on the Rise

Friday, November 12th, 2010

This week I was one of nearly 1000 attendees at the Annual Market Research Event that took place in San Diego, California. There are all sorts of reasons why people attend this conference – for me, it was the opportunity to hear the chatter from within the research business and to get a sense of what’s important to this tribe of bright people and specifically what they are thinking and feeling about the future.

So let me start with a few personal observations: (more…)

divider

GOOGLE – All You Need is Love… Love is All You Need

Wednesday, August 11th, 2010

valentine03

Google is a fantastic brand. Period. I only say this as a starter statement to clearly establish where I stand following a spate of recent articles questioning the continued long-term success of this 12 year old search titan. The article that pushed me over the edge was in the latest edition of Fortune magazine and it’s well worth a read [Click to Read].

So, in response to the question ā€œIs Google over?ā€, I would answer a categorical ā€œNoā€ but let me add a few more detailed observations: (more…)

divider

The Battle for LeBron

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

lebron_james-4349

This summer, the most interesting positioning fight isn’t between old rivals like Coke vs. Pepsi, or even new competitors like iPhone vs. Droid. Instead, our attention is riveted by the multi-sided positioning brawl between NBA teams desperate to win the right to lavish millions on free agent superstar LeBron James. (more…)

divider

Elevating the Thinking on Difference

Thursday, June 10th, 2010

different

I am not usually asked to review books and I wasn’t this time either!! But I spotted Professor Youngme Moon’s new book entitled ā€œDifferent – Escaping the Competitive Herdā€ at an airport bookstand and the minute I saw it and held it in my hand, I knew it was going to be a good reading experience. (more…)

divider

United… By Committee

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

As I have said before on this blog, I do always try to be constructive when writing about brands. But as an experienced marketer, I also know that it’s easier to be destructive rather than constructive when one is critiquing events. Which is why I held back from commenting about the recent United/Continental marriage. However, a week has passed by and I still don’t have many good feelings about the brand component of this deal but lest I become obsolete, it’s time to put the finger to the keyboard with a few thoughts.

UnitedAirlines (more…)

divider

Brands – From Really Smart to Not So Smart

Friday, April 9th, 2010

It’s been a busy, busy week in the brand world. And what has been remarkable about this particular week is that we’ve witnessed inspiring examples of brands at their best as well as embarrassing examples of brands at their worst. Let’s start on an upbeat note with Apple and the iPad.

(more…)