Archive for February, 2011

divider

The Oscars: Time To Change… Please!

Monday, February 28th, 2011

The Oscars is the ultimate, star-studded, classy extravaganza in our annual calendars and yet the morning after the 83rd event, I have to admit that I am left feeling a little sad and disappointed.

Now my comments that follow are not directed at any one of the mediocre thank-you speeches or at the disproportionate focus in last night’s show on the Academy of the past. No, my concerns are centered fairly and squarely on the obsolete and restrictive format which makes the three hour event (not of course counting the pre-show) a bit like root canal treatment and certainly not the uplifting and inspiring performance it should be
and used to be.

And that’s because the world has changed and the Oscars hasn’t.

If I am being completely honest, I don’t think I can watch another one
although I have said that for some years yet somehow, between this last show and the next, I forgive the organizers totally and return to the event, hoping for a transformation. But it never comes.

So for a moment, let’s think of the Oscars as a brand. Now that statement in itself might be heresy for some but please give me a moment to outline my thoughts. I see four issues that, in my opinion, need to be resolved, if the Oscars is to survive and thrive in the dynamic media and entertainment world in which we now reside. Incidentally, each of these issues are challenges that many brands face everyday:

oscar_blue1.    The first issue concerns the target audience. And a simple question – is the show aimed at the professional movie-making community or the general public who pay to see the end results? Because it is becoming clearer and clearer that in todays complex and fragmenting media world, appealing to both at the same time is no longer an option. In fact, it is responsible for causing a serious case of brand schizophrenia.

2.    The second point is about the overall brand connection. Brand success today involves isolating the best way to create a conversation and a dialogue with your audience, not to just talk at them. In this regard, the way that the Oscars brand communicates feels really old- fashioned. It feels like another case of “my father’s Oldsmobile” and look what happened to them!!

3.    While we would agree whole-heartedly that great brands are built from the inside-out, we also passionately believe that consumers are playing a greater and greater role in the process. Across many categories of everyday life, more consumers are becoming producers, and the Oscars presents a unique opportunity to acknowledge the value of consumer co-creation in today’s creative arena and to celebrate the best of breed in this department.

4.    Successful brands today are dynamic and have to constantly change with the times to survive. And brand innovation is a mandatory part of the tool-kit needed for change. But I am not seeing or feeling the Oscars brand innovation quotient, either in content, in channel, in format or in tone of voice. A healthy appetite for Innovation allows a brand to keep in sync with its audience and to feel contemporary and relevant, while still of course being true to its roots.

If this all sounds negative, it’s born out of a clear understanding that for brands to survive, they must change with the times. Nobody likes change but without a regular injection of it, brands run the risk of losing their appeal, their relevance and their role. I feel that this is happening to the Oscars brand. But because the process is organic and happens over time, brand owners often fail to take the sort of radical surgery necessary to reposition and redirect the brand. Sometimes, they don’t know what to do, sometimes, they don’t even know they have a problem.

We love the Oscars – they have been a part of our lives for many years but without change, they risk being marginalized and nobody, including myself, would ever wish for that.

Simon Williams

divider

Sterling Buzz…

Saturday, February 26th, 2011

On Friday,  our own Debbie Millman got to lead the discussion at Creative Mornings in DUMBO, Brooklyn. Click here for a snippet of her inspiring presentation (to a packed house!)

For a video of the full presentation, visit CreativeMornings.com and follow Tina Roth Eisenberg @swissmiss on Twitter for updates on speakers and great design inspiration.

DM-CM

DM-CM2

DM-CM3

For more photos, visit us at facebook.com/sterling.brands

Tune in weekly for Debbie’s latest podcast, Design Matters where design, branding and life intersect: HERE.

divider

Sterling Buzz…

Thursday, February 24th, 2011

Debbie_10AsDebbie’s been featured on the great website: 10 Answers, which serves up daily interviews with creative minds from around the globe.

1. How would you describe your work in three words?

Work is life.

2. Who is your creative role model?

>>click through to read all 10 Answers>>

divider

BBQ’s New Best Friend: Jack Daniel’s RTD

Friday, February 18th, 2011

Read more at popsop.com

Read more at popsop.com

With summer and, more importantly, GRILLING season just around the bend, we’re really excited to see a new type of RTD out on the market from Jack Daniel’s– there’s nothing like whiskey and some steak!

Along with a nicely-executed design, we couldn’t help but notice that Jack is one of the first RTD mixed drinks from a major brand that’s housed in an aluminum bottle– a trend we we felt was destined to heat up in the wine and alcohol category. Aluminum is great for super-cold drinks, a lot safer in the backyard or around pools, it’s a sustainable choice and has an excellent shelf life.

Looks like whiskey is now out with the solid lead and we’re eager to try the new Jack. We’re curious tho- What’s the appropriate nick name for these tasty looking suckers?

divider

Sterling Buzz…

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

This week on Design Matters, Debbie welcomes the Director of Electronic Media at CalTech (and fabulous designer) Gail Anderson!

Gail_America

Tune in and stay social this Friday at 3pm at Designobserver.com

Gail_Social

divider

The Cute Factor

Wednesday, February 16th, 2011

necessary_tech

Recently, I had to take the plunge and finally get wireless Internet in my home. I’ve tried to abstain for as long as possible in the hopes of living in the ‘real world’ from time to time, but freelance work seeping into my home life has rendered me a terminally virtual babe.

Now, there are few hassles as egregious as waiting in the DMV line, alternate side parking laws and the ever-elusive appointment with your cable/internet guy, but unfortunately they are necessary motions we must go through to live.

This past week I answered the thuds at my door, permitted cable man Stan’s entry into my home and found the process to be rather painless. I showed Stan into the living room and let him have at it while I simultaneously dried my hair, drank my coffee, set up my Blackberry notices and caught up on This American Life. Just as I completed my morning ritual, Stan was handing me an invoice to sign. I glanced over his shoulder at that moment and literally cooed at the site of
 a router.

Yes, a router.

All my life I’ve dealt with technology and found that whenever it’s a ‘necessary’ piece of tech it always has to be an ugly piece of tech. Looking over Stan’s shoulder I spied something that was much more reminiscent of an alarm clock-radio, in a lovely metallic blue and silver tone and a curvier shape than any router I’ve seen.

I know it’s just a router, but it makes a difference when home accessories match the dĂ©cor. I want to like everything in my home. To me, this is a symbol of Time Warner’s effort, albeit small, to fit into My life instead of vice versa.

Sometimes it’s the small details that touch us and help improve brand perception. Now how about some free WiFi at the DMV? Or at least a hug.

Rochelle Fainstein

divider

Happy Valentines Day from SB

Monday, February 14th, 2011

Happy_Vday

divider

Brand Positioning- Time to Turn Up the Volume

Friday, February 11th, 2011

11

Almost all agencies worth their salt include it as one of their core competencies. Almost every client of any sophistication acknowledges its importance. And yet, it seems to me, as an avid brand follower, that the topic of brand positioning and the accompanying benefit to the end user of meaningful difference, is totally absent from the everyday debate and chatter about brands.

Big question:  If brand positioning is that important and if it is so widely practiced, why the silence?

In my view, there are a number of reasons:

1.    The business of positioning is a fundamentally strategic exercise and over the past 10 years at least, the marketing community has become more and more interested and focused on the executional aspects of branding. Strategy, while appreciated, just doesn’t have the same sex appeal.

2. This point has been further exacerbated by what I call the “manliness factor” that still pervades many agencies today. A typical response would be along the following lines– “of course we can do positioning
I mean it’s strategic. That’s what we are, that’s what we do, isn’t it?”

3. More recently, we’ve all become (understandably) obsessed by digital and social media and these two together have turned up the volume so loud that almost every other topic in the marketing arena has suffered.

4. The topic of positioning has been further diluted by the absence of a champion. Many of us still remember the Ries & Trout book on positioning that was published in 1981, yes 1981. That’s 30 years ago. And the book is still in print and still being read. For a few years in the ‘90’s, Tom Peters took up the cause but since then, nobody has become famous talking about positioning.

What makes this situation even stranger is that consumers really value the importance of difference in a brand and in a 2010 research study that we undertook at Sterling Brands among 4000 US consumers, many were able to articulate the nuances between brands. They saw Pixar, Wii, Apple, Lego and Google as being very different. At the other extreme, they saw Citi, Bank of America, Capitol One and Chase as being almost totally interchangeable. The point here is that difference (aka positioning) continues to be important to every audience, whether it be agency, brand owner or end-user.

With no common standards and no agreed definition of what it means, everyone has set up their own version of positioning. And the result is exactly what one would expect…chaos! It is common in our work with clients to be handed historical or current positioning documents and this is where the problem can be seen more clearly. For example:

- on many occasions, positioning work authored by advertising agencies is not so much brand positioning but more communications positioning and yet it is referred to as ‘brand’ positioning

- when we see the work of digital agencies, positioning is often focused on just the digital opportunity, not the broader brand opportunity

- when we see the work from some other agencies, we sometimes see tag lines presented as positioning

- and sometimes clients conduct their own positioning and guess what, it’s often done by committee and the 300 words that go to make up the final prose often end up in inactionable jargon

Now please do not take this ranting as criticism of any of our competitors or any of our clients. That’s not the point. The real issue here is that positioning is a critical step in building successful brands and yet there is no single agreed approach that is contemporary and relevant to the times in which we live. With so much lack of consistency, we feel it’s time to bring some rigor and some discipline and some innovative thinking to positioning development. This would be good for everyone involved because it would level the playing field and the real leaders in positioning would emerge naturally from the marketplace and the faux ‘positioners’ would also naturally disappear.

It will take some sort of revolution to make this happen and it may not happen anytime soon but we’re ready, willing and able to be at the forefront of this positioning revolution. Anybody else like to join us?

Simon Williams

divider

Sterling Buzz…

Thursday, February 10th, 2011

DebbieM

Design Matters airs tomorrow (Friday) with another brand new episode!

Next up for the new season is Kate Betts, former editor-in-chief of Harper’s Bazaar, contributing editor at Time, and author of Everyday Icon: Michelle Obama and the Power of Style.

Check out the great little write-up about it on Unbeige and tune in to hear the podcast at 3pm Friday at designobserver.com

divider

Sterling Buzz…

Tuesday, February 1st, 2011

designmattersreturns

Join Debbie for the return of Design Matters this Friday, featuring  Author and NY Times Columnist, Rob Walker.

And stay tuned for a season jam-packed with guests from the places where brands and design collide.

Listen to it HERE.